Independent Editorial Review Platform

Supplements Under Scrutiny:
Real Evidence or Marketing?

37 products analyzed. 100+ peer-reviewed studies reviewed. One mission: the truth about what's actually inside your supplements.

37+ Products Analyzed
100+ Studies Reviewed
100% Independent
EFSA & FDA Compliant

8 Categories, 37+ Products Decoded

Every category independently reviewed — from the science behind the formula to the real-world track record of each brand.

All Categories →
Weight Loss & Metabolism
🔥

Weight Loss & Metabolism

7 products analyzed

Explore →
Male Vitality & Prostate
💪

Male Vitality & Prostate

4 products analyzed

Explore →
Hearing Health & Tinnitus
👂

Hearing Health & Tinnitus

5 products analyzed

Explore →
Biohacking & Longevity

Biohacking & Longevity

4 products analyzed

Explore →
Gut Health & Microbiome
🦠

Gut Health & Microbiome

4 products analyzed

Explore →
Cognitive Focus & Nootropics
🧠

Cognitive Focus & Nootropics

3 products analyzed

Explore →
Chronic Pain & Sleep
🩹

Chronic Pain & Sleep

5 products analyzed

Explore →
Glycemic Control & Metabolic
🩸

Glycemic Control & Metabolic

4 products analyzed

Explore →

Browse All Products A–Z

37+ products independently reviewed. Click a letter to filter or scroll to browse all.

Our Editorial Promise

The health supplement industry is full of noise. We committed to cutting through it with four non-negotiable principles.

Verifiable Science

Every claim in our analyses links to a peer-reviewed study with a DOI or PMID number. You can verify every reference independently via PubMed or Google Scholar.

Total Editorial Independence

No brand sponsorships. No paid placements. No products pay to be featured. Our affiliate commissions are disclosed openly and never influence our ratings or conclusions.

Radical Honesty

We publish real pros AND real cons. Our ratings range from 3.5 to 4.8 — never 5-star across the board. If a product has commercial red flags, we document them explicitly.

Rigorous Compliance

We operate under EFSA, FDA and ANVISA editorial guidelines. Zero therapeutic claims without clinical evidence. Zero "miracle cure" language. Science only.

Referenced Researchers by Category

Our analyses reference published research from leading scientists at the world's top institutions. These are the real researchers behind the science we cite.

Meet Full Team →
MS

Dr. Marie-Pierre St-Onge

PhD — Obesity & Lipid Metabolism

Columbia University Medical Center

Weight Loss & Metabolism

Adipose tissue responds to dietary lipid composition in ways that are frequently overlooked in supplement marketing.

TW

Dr. Timothy Wilt

MD — Internal Medicine & Urology

Minneapolis VA / University of Minnesota

Male Vitality & Prostate

Three Cochrane Reviews on Saw Palmetto, Beta-Sitosterol and Pygeum — the gold standard of evidence for prostate health supplements.

WS

Dr. Winfried Schlee

PhD — Tinnitus Neuroscience

Universität Regensburg, Germany

Hearing Health & Tinnitus

Cortical mapping of tinnitus has revealed mechanisms that supplement marketing often exploits without understanding.

BB

Dr. Brinnae Bent

PhD — IoMT & Wearable Technology

Duke University

Biohacking & Longevity

Wearable sensor accuracy varies enormously — precision claims must be validated against clinical-grade reference standards.

ME

Dr. Mary Ellen Sanders

PhD — Probiotic Microbiology

ISAPP — International

Gut Health & Microbiome

Co-author of the official scientific consensus definition of postbiotics — the standard the industry must meet, not just claim.

MP

Dr. Matthew P. Pase

PhD — Neurology & Cognition

Harvard / Monash University

Cognitive Focus & Nootropics

Bacopa Monnieri improved performance in 9 of 17 memory tests across multiple RCTs. That's the bar for calling something evidence-based.

DC

Dr. Daniel O. Clegg

MD — Rheumatology & Osteoarthritis

University of Utah

Chronic Pain & Sleep

Principal investigator of the GAIT Trial — published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the definitive study on glucosamine and chondroitin.

WC

Dr. William T. Cefalu

MD — Endocrinology & Metabolism

NIH / NIDDK

Glycemic Control & Metabolic

Chromium's role in insulin sensitivity has been studied for decades. The evidence is moderate — and that's exactly the kind of honest assessment consumers deserve.

What We've Analyzed So Far

Scientific research team
Editorial certifications and trust seals
37+
Products Independently Analyzed
100+
Peer-Reviewed Studies Reviewed
30+
Researchers Referenced
8
Health Categories Covered
10+
Monitoring Platforms Tracked
100%
Independent Editorial